tammy's blog about

AI alignment,
utopia,
anthropics,
and more;

the universal distribution ("UD") and its applicability to anthropics apparently suffers from some issues.

one is uncomputability. i think a speed penalty seems reasonable; but as a more general solution, i think it is unreasonable to "wait for the machine to halt". instead, let us see turing machines as running forever, with getting stuck on a repeating state as a special case. then, the space of all computations on a given universal turing machine ("UTM") is a set of pairs `(input program, time step)`

; or more simply, if we use a universal complete program, it is *just* a time step: every computation will be ran at some point.

this model feels quite natural to me, and seems like an easy way to rank priors: weigh the result of hypotheses by the inverse of the time step at which the universal complete program runs into them.

this also helps with UDASSA: if you use a deterministic model of computation where every computation step only does a finite amount of stuff (like turing machines or SKI calculus, but unlike wolfram-style graph rewriting) then you don't need a "claw" program to locate you within the world described by the world program; you are simply located at the set of time steps which happen to be updating the part of world that is *you*. this gives us a natural "locator" for persons within the space of all computation; it flattens together time, space, timelines (when a computation splits a world into multiple states all of which it then continues computing), and possible computation machines all into one neat linear sequence of steps.

unless otherwise specified on individual pages, all posts on this website are licensed under the CC_-1 license.

unless explicitely mentioned, all content on this site was created by me; not by others nor AI.